Market Insights from Dennis Lockhart: U.S. Economic Outlook, Fed Policy, and Commercial Real Estate Trends

Comparte este post
Spotify Logo Icon
Amazon Music Logo Icon
I heart Radio Logo Icon
Apple Podcast Logo Icon
YouTube Logo Icon

Peachtree Group CEO Greg Friedman and CFO Jatin Desai hosted Dennis Lockhart, former President of the Atlanta Federal Reserve for a fireside chat conversation during Peachtree Group's annual Investor Day. Lockhart spoke on the US economic outlook, Federal Reserve policy, geopolitical risks and commercial real estate trends.

Here are key highlights from their discussion.

Dennis Lockhart, former President of the Atlanta Federal Reserve talks with Peachtree CEO Greg Friedman and CFO Jatin Desai about the US economic outlook, Federal Reserve policy, geopolitical risk sand commercial real estate.

Summary of the Economy:

  • The U.S. economy is performing well with steady growth. First-quarter growth was around 1.3-1.4% annualized GDP, but underlying indicators suggest stronger performance, with the Atlanta Fed projecting 3.1% annualized GDP growth for Q2 2024.
  • Unemployment is low at 4%, with recent job gains of 272,000. The private sector, especially healthcare, is driving job growth, leading to a more sustainable employment market and supporting consumer spending.
  • Strong employment ensures income stability for consumers, driving sustained consumption, which constitutes about 70% of GDP.
  • Inflation has decreased from its peak but remains above the Federal Reserve's target. The Fed prefers the Personal Consumption Expenditure (PCE) Index over the Consumer Price Index (CPI), with the current core PCE inflation rate at 2.7-2.8%, still above the 2% target. While adjusting the target inflation rate from 2% seems highly unlikely due to the Fed’s strong commitment and public trust in this goal, a more flexible approach within a defined range might be possible. This allows     the Fed to address inflation without formally changing the target, leveraging the current economic strength to be patient and let inflation decline over time.

Federal Open Market Committee’s Perspective:

  • The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) is committed to making decisions on interest rates and monetary policy without political influence. Over a decade of attending meetings, Dennis has rarely seen political considerations come up. However, by tradition, the FOMC avoids action in the meeting immediately before a national election to prevent any appearance of political bias. Under Jay Powell's leadership, if necessary, the FOMC would act in September, but current conditions likely won't force action until after the election.
  • While different policies implemented by the elected candidate could shape the economy in the long term, the election itself is not anticipated to have an immediate impact. However, if post-election circumstances lead to significant disruptions, it could give the Federal Reserve pause at their November meeting.
  • If inflation doesn't improve or disinflation stalls at around 2.7-2.8%, the Fed may need to raise rates further. Conversely, consistent positive disinflation data     could lead to rate cuts by year-end. There are several scenarios to consider:
    • Sticky Inflation: If inflation remains high, the Fed might raise rates toward the end of the year or early 2025.
    • Disinflation Resumption: Positive disinflation data could lead to rate cuts in November or December.
    • Economic Slowdown: If the economy shows signs of faltering and businesses anticipate a recession, resulting in layoffs and reduced consumer spending, the Fed might cut rates to stabilize the situation.
    • Financial Instability: A financial stability event, similar to the Silicon Valley Bank incident last year, could prompt the Fed to cut rates to address underlying banking system issues, especially in commercial real estate.
  • The FOMC's narrative is that the economy is gradually slowing down. The employment picture remains very positive and strong, though it is rebalancing and not as robust as in 2022 and 2023. Inflation is still elevated, but the FOMC believes disinflation will resume, allowing them to begin easing policy restrictions by the end of the year. However, all of this depends on how the data comes in and the overall economic picture painted by the upcoming months. Upcoming Fed meetings are scheduled for July, September, November, and December. Policymaking remains cautious, with an emphasis on waiting for clear trends in inflation data before making further changes.

 

Geopolitical Risks:

  • Geopolitical events can significantly impact financial markets and potentially change the economic outlook for the U.S., at least temporarily. These events, often unexpected, can disrupt equity markets and influence the economy.  However, the Federal Reserve tends to be largely oblivious to geopolitics. Despite being close to the State Department, the Fed staff, mostly PhD economists, focus primarily on domestic issues and rarely consult with experts on geopolitical matters. This domestic focus means that while geopolitical events are serious and can influence the economy, they are not heavily factored into the Fed's policy decisions or economic projections.

 

Monetary Policy:

  • The balance sheet is a central tool for monetary policy. When interest rates hit zero during the Great Recession and the pandemic, the Fed used quantitative easing (QE) to stimulate the economy by increasing bank reserves, which supports lending and adds liquidity to financial markets. This led to the significant expansion of the Fed's balance sheet.
  • Currently, the Fed is slowly reducing its balance sheet to withdraw stimulus from the economy. This process, known as quantitative tightening, aims to find a new balance that provides ample bank reserves and liquidity without disrupting credit markets. The Fed approaches this carefully to avoid financial instability, such as the incident that occurred during a previous tightening attempt. This balance sheet adjustment is a critical but often behind-the-scenes aspect of monetary     policy.

Fiscal Policy:

  • Fiscal policy, especially deficit spending, boosts demand and contributes to inflation. During the pandemic, significant stimulus measures supported households and businesses but also added to inflationary pressures. However, inflation is a global issue and not solely caused by domestic fiscal policy.
  • Federal Reserve Chairman Jay Powell acknowledges the unsustainable fiscal situation due to high debt levels but avoids criticizing Congress. The Fed factors in fiscal policy as one of many economic influences, recognizing its role in supporting growth, which can conflict with the Fed's inflation control efforts.
  • The Treasury's debt issuance strategy affects the bond market and banks holding these securities. Fiscal and monetary policies often create conflicting pressures, but the Fed incorporates these effects into their economic assessments and decisions.

 

Banking Sector:

  • Banks, particularly regional and community banks, have significant exposure to commercial real estate, making up around 40% of the market. While national banks have less exposure, the real estate market downturn has affected all banks, with properties like office spaces experiencing severe value declines and multifamily properties down by nearly 30% from their peak values due to high interest rates. Despite Federal Reserve Chair Powell's reassurances about the banking system's     stability, there are concerns about the real-time recognition of crises. Historical precedent suggests that crises often go unnoticed until they are well underway.
  • The upcoming maturities of approximately $850 billion in commercial real estate loans present a potential risk. The exposure is dispersed across various financial entities, which is somewhat reassuring. However, small and regional banks are particularly vulnerable. The failure of a significant regional bank due to real estate exposure could have severe economic repercussions, unlike the manageable impact of community bank failures.
  • Banks are currently managing the situation by extending loan maturities, effectively buying time to stabilize individual properties. While this approach can mitigate immediate issues, it also reduces banks' lending appetite. A significant reduction in credit availability, particularly for small businesses that rely on smaller banks, could trigger a recession. This dynamic highlights the delicate balance between managing existing problems and maintaining sufficient credit flow to support economic activity.

Commercial Real Estate:

  • The near-term and long-term valuations of commercial real estate, particularly in hospitality, will depend on market fundamentals. The office sector faces significant challenges due to the rise of remote work, which could reduce long-term demand for office space. Companies are still figuring out their office policies, with some adopting hybrid models.
  • The retail sector is affected by online shopping, and the hospitality sector is recovering from the pandemic but hasn't fully rebounded. There are no major issues expected in hospitality unless there is overbuilding.
  • Office spaces were already saturated pre-pandemic, and suburban offices now struggle to find tenants. Many offices remain underutilized, with some businesses likely to stay remote. Converting office buildings to apartments is often not feasible due to technical constraints.
  • The multifamily housing sector continues to show strong demand and remains a stable area in commercial real estate.

Relacionado publicaciones

Si te ha gustado este artículo, lee estos comunicados de prensa y puntos de vista relacionados.
General
En las noticias
5 minutos de lectura

Schwab Network: 'New Game' with High-Interest Rates

Greg Friedman discussed on the Schwab network how the high rate environment is reshaping valuations and refinancing, with 90% of office vacancies concentrated in just 30% of buildings.

Schwab NetworkGreg Friedman joins Nicole Petallides at the NYSE site with a deep-dive into the high rate environment facing investors right now. When looking at the 10-year Treasury rate which is "more than double pre-2022 average," Greg believes its reshaping valuations and refinancing dynamics. In the real estate realm, he sees uneven performance saying "90% of office vacancies are in just 30% of office buildings."

General
En las noticias
5 minutos de lectura

CNBC: La Reserva Federal reduce los tipos de interés: ¿un punto de inflexión para los inversores inmobiliarios comerciales o simplemente una farsa?

El director ejecutivo de Peachtree, Greg Friedman, habló en Fast Money de CNBC sobre el efecto de los recientes recortes de tipos de la Reserva Federal en el mercado inmobiliario comercial.
Greg Friedman, director ejecutivo de Peachtree Group, habla sobre El dinero rápido de CNBC

La reducción de 50 puntos básicos de la Reserva Federal a la tasa de los fondos federales en septiembre ha provocado nuevas conversaciones sobre su impacto en las inversiones inmobiliarias comerciales (CRE). Si bien en algunos sectores hay optimismo con respecto a la vuelta a un entorno de tipos más bajos, el mercado de bonos señala una historia diferente, ya que los tipos de interés a largo plazo se mantienen altos y los riesgos de inflación persisten. Este es un buen recordatorio de que los tipos a corto plazo, establecidos por la Reserva Federal, y los tipos a largo plazo, como los del Tesoro a 10 años, suelen moverse de forma independiente.

 

El entorno actual de tasas más altas reconfigura los fundamentos del valor de la CRE. La tasa actual del Tesoro a 10 años, de alrededor del 4% (el doble de la media anterior a 2022) exige que los valores de la CRE se recalibren. Los informes sobre una caída del 20% en los valores de los CRE desde los niveles máximos de 2022 requieren contexto; esas valoraciones se basaron en un entorno de tipos de interés muy diferente. El escenario actual implica una trayectoria de crecimiento más lenta, lo que exige que los inversores se adapten a un «nuevo juego» de tipos más altos durante más tiempo.

 

En todos los activos de CRE, los diferentes sectores responden a las tasas más altas de distintas maneras. Los hoteles, por ejemplo, se benefician de una sólida demanda a medida que aumentan los viajes, mientras que los activos multifamiliares siguen mostrando resiliencia a pesar de las presiones de refinanciación. Sin embargo, los activos de oficina se enfrentan a un estrés significativo debido a los desafíos seculares y a los impulsados por los tipos de interés.

 

A pesar de que la Reserva Federal reduce los tipos, la refinanciación de deuda que antes tenía tasas bajas presenta desafíos continuos para los activos de CRE, especialmente aquellos con fechas de vencimiento próximas. Los tipos más altos elevan el costo de la deuda y reducen los flujos de caja, al tiempo que repercuten en las valoraciones generales de los activos, lo que ejerce una presión adicional.

A pesar de los obstáculos, el entorno actual ofrece oportunidades únicas para los inversores estratégicos y ágiles. Si bien los tipos más altos pueden hacer bajar el valor de los activos, para quienes estén preparados para navegar por el mercado actual con un apalancamiento moderado y una estrategia con visión de futuro, los desafíos actuales pueden convertirse en vientos de favor en el futuro. Dado que las recientes medidas de la Reserva Federal apuntan a una era en la que «subirán durante más tiempo», los inversores en bienes raíces comerciales que se adapten con rapidez podrían encontrar oportunidades sin precedentes, por lo que este es un momento inmejorable para tomar medidas decisivas en el sector inmobiliario comercial.

 

Vea al CEO y director gerente de Peachtree Group, Greg Friedman, hablar sobre este tema en Fast Money de CNBC.

General
Perspectiva
5 minutos de lectura

Evite el ruido político al invertir: una actualización del mercado con Larry Adam y Raymond James

Peachtree Group recibió a Larry Adam, director de inversiones de Raymond James, en una reciente convocatoria de mercado. Larry habló sobre la importancia de mantener la inversión durante los ciclos políticos, como las próximas elecciones presidenciales de EE. UU.

En nuestra reciente convocatoria de actualización del mercado, escuchamos las opiniones de Larry Adam, director de inversiones de Raymond James, junto con Greg Friedman, director general y director ejecutivo de Peachtree Group, y Daniel Savage, vicepresidente de mercados de capital variable de Peachtree Group. Uno de los momentos más destacados del debate fue una interesante conclusión sobre la inversión, que destaca la importancia de invertir de manera consistente en lugar de intentar cronometrar el mercado en función de los ciclos políticos.

Perspectivas de inversión a lo largo de las décadas

Considera lo siguiente: si hubieras invertido 10 000$ en el mercado de valores a partir de 1970 y solo hubieras seguido invirtiendo durante las presidencias republicanas, tu inversión ya habría crecido hasta alcanzar aproximadamente 133 000$. Por el contrario, si solo hubiera mantenido sus inversiones durante las presidencias demócratas, su cartera se habría disparado hasta situarse en torno a los 700 000 dólares.

Ahora, aquí es donde las cifras se vuelven aún más convincentes. Si hubiera seguido invirtiendo totalmente en el mercado, independientemente del partido que estuviera en el poder, esos 10.000$ iniciales se habrían revalorizado hasta alcanzar una cifra impresionante 1,6 millones de dólares!

La lección: Mantén el rumbo

La sincronización del mercado en función de la afiliación política ha demostrado ser menos eficaz que mantener una estrategia de inversión coherente. Como señaló Larry Adam, »Es más importante estar en el mercado que tratar de encontrarlo. Creo que es una lección fundamental...»

La volatilidad que conlleva los cambios políticos puede tentar a los inversores a dar marcha atrás o a tomar decisiones apresuradas. Sin embargo, la historia demuestra que quienes se mantienen pacientes e invierten en todas las condiciones del mercado tienden a cosechar las mayores recompensas.

La clave es estar en el mercado, no intentar ser más astuto que él.
Diapositiva proporcionada por Raymond James

Acerca de Larry Adam

Larry Adam se unió a Raymond James en 2018 como director de inversiones. Con más de treinta años de experiencia en los mercados financieros, el Sr. Adam aporta a asesores y clientes una gran cantidad de conocimientos e información valiosa sobre los mercados y la economía. Como director de TI, el Sr. Adam desarrolla la visión del director de TI de la empresa, una perspectiva macroeconómica coherente y completa, utilizando los conocimientos y las perspectivas de los estrategas de la empresa. El Sr. Adam participa en numerosos eventos para clientes y es reconocido por su habilidad para explicar conceptos complejos a los inversores.

El Sr. Adam proporciona a los asesores y clientes una orientación exhaustiva sobre los mercados, que incluye comentarios semanales y mensuales y perspectivas trimestrales. Además de ocupar el cargo de presidente del Comité de Estrategia de Inversiones, también forma parte del Comité de Contratación del Campus de Diversidad e Inclusión de Global Wealth Solutions (GWS), del Consejo Ejecutivo de GWS y del Comité de Aprobación de Productos de Inversiones Alternativas y Estructuradas.

Antes de unirse a Raymond James, el Sr. Adam ocupó los dos cargos de CIO de las Américas y principal estratega de inversiones globales en Deutsche Bank Private Wealth Management. Se licenció en Administración de Empresas con especialización en Finanzas por la Universidad Loyola de Maryland en 1991 y obtuvo un máster en Administración de Empresas con especialización en Finanzas por la Universidad Loyola de Maryland en 1993. El Sr. Adam es profesor adjunto en la Escuela Sellinger de Negocios y Administración de la Universidad de Loyola, donde imparte clases de finanzas internacionales. Recibió la designación de analista financiero certificado en 1996, la certificación Certified Investment Management® en 2001 y la designación de planificador financiero certificado® en 2004. El Sr. Adam aparece regularmente en CNBC y Bloomberg y se le cita con frecuencia en publicaciones de renombre como Wall Street Journal y De Barron.